
-
Editorials
- Bradenton Herald
- Daytona Beach News-Journal
- Florida Times-Union
- Florida Today
- Ft. Myers News-Press
- Gainesville Sun
- Lakeland Ledger
- Miami Herald
- Naples Daily News
- NWF Daily News
- Ocala Star-Banner
- Orlando Sentinel
- Palm Beach Post
- Pensacola News Journal
- Sarasota Herald-Tribune
- TCPalm
- Sun-Sentinel
- Tallahassee Democrat
- Tampa Bay Times
- Columnists
- Cartoons
-
Press Releases
- Sayfie Review
- FL Speaker of the House
- FL Agriculture Commissioner
- FL Senate President
- FL Governor
- US Senator Moody
- FL Attorney General
- US Senator Scott
- FL CFO
- Congressional Delegation ≻
- Matt Gaetz
- Neal Dunn
- Kat Cammack
- Aaron Bean
- John Rutherford
- Michael Waltz
- Cory Mills
- Bill Posey
- Darren Soto
- Maxwell Frost
- Daniel Webster
- Gus Bilirakis
- Anna Paulina Luna
- Kathy Castor
- Laurel Lee
- Vern Buchanan
- Greg Steube
- Scott Franklin
- Byron Donalds
- Sheila Cherfilus McCormick
- Brian Mast
- Lois Frankel
- Jared Moskowitz
- Frederica Wilson
- Debbie Wasserman Schultz
- Mario Diaz-Balart
- Maria Elvira Salazar
- Carlos Gimenez
- Political Links
-
News Links
- Drudge Report
- NewsMax.com
- AP Florida News
- ABC News' The Note
- NBC News' First Read
- Florida Channel
- Florida TV Stations
- Florida Radio Stations
- Capitol Update
- Florida Newspapers
- Florida Trend
- South Florida Business Journal
- Tampa Bay Business Journal
- Orlando Business Journal
- Jacksonville Business Journal
- News Service of Florida
- Politico Playbook
- Washington Post The Daily 202
-
Research
- Florida Fiscal Portal
- Search Florida Laws
- Search House Bills
- Search Senate Bills
- Search County, City Laws
- Search County Clerks' Records
- Cabinet Agendas, Transcripts
- Search Executive Orders
- Search Atty. General Opinions
- Search Supreme Court Docket
- Florida Supreme Court Rulings
- Search Florida Corporations
- Search Administrative Rules
- Proposed Administrative Rules
- View Advertised Contracts
- Refdesk.com
- Government Services Guide
- Electoral Vote Map
-
Reference
- Florida House
- Florida Senate
- Find Your Congressman
- Find Your State Legislator
- Find Your Local Officials
- Find Government Phone #'s
- Florida Agencies
- Florida Cities
- Florida Counties
- Florida Universities
- County Tax Collectors
- County Property Appraisers
- County Clerks of Court
- County Elections Supervisors
- MyFlorida.com
- OPPAGA
Sun-Sentinel: Tackling a toxic courthouse culture in Broward | Editorial
Sun-Sentinel: Secrecy is a sickness at health agency | Editorial
Sun-Sentinel: Justice prevails: A Trump judge stops the steal in N.C. | Editorial
Herald: Pope Leo XIV's first international trip should begin in Miami. Here's why | Opinion
Herald: Florida may not be ready for an above-average hurricane season. Here's why | Opinion
Sun-Sentinel: The callous cruelty of erasing images of gun victims | Editorial
Herald: Designating Haiti's gangs as terrorists risks humanitarian aid | Opinion
Sun-Sentinel: Welcome Pope Leo XIV, America's Holy Father | Editorial
FPL, AT&T battle over utility poles
August 1, 2019
By Jim Saunders
TALLAHASSEE --- In a clash of two of the state’s most-prominent companies, Florida Power & Light and AT&T Florida are battling in court and at the Federal Communications Commission about payments for the use of utility poles.
AT&T asked a federal court this week to dismiss a lawsuit in which FPL accuses the telecommunications company of breaching a contract that deals with payments for the use of hundreds of thousands of poles. AT&T pointed to a complaint it filed at the Federal Communications Commission alleging FPL has long charged “unjust and unreasonable” rates for AT&T to attach equipment to poles.
“The FCC will issue the controlling decision in the parties’ rental rate dispute,” AT&T said, also raising the possibility of putting the lawsuit on hold. “It has the statutory obligation to ensure that AT&T is charged a ‘just and reasonable’ pole attachment rate and the authority to award refunds of AT&T’s overpayments.”
In the lawsuit, filed July 1, FPL alleged that the telecommunications company did not pay about $20 million owed for 2017 and 2018. The companies have had what is known as a joint-use agreement since 1975 that has allowed them to share poles, with guidelines for determining how much they might owe each other, according to the lawsuit.
“After 43 years, AT&T Florida unilaterally stopped making contractually required payments to FPL despite repeated requests by FPL,” the lawsuit said. “It nonetheless continues to enjoy all of its contractual benefits. AT&T Florida's failure to pay significant money payment obligations to FPL constitutes a material breach of the agreement.”
In the dismissal motion filed this week, AT&T said it delivered checks to FPL for the disputed amounts just hours after the lawsuit was filed. Nevertheless, also on July 1, AT&T filed the complaint at the Federal Communications Commission and contends it should receive refunds going back to 2014 because of what it describes as excessive charges that violate federal law.
“The parties’ dispute over the lawfulness of these (2017 and 2018) invoices continues --- but it continues at the Federal Communications Commission, where it will and must be decided,” AT&T said in the court document this week. “For while FPL claims that it invoiced pole attachment rates that comply with the parties’ joint use agreement … the agreement and federal law forbid FPL from charging AT&T a pole attachment rate that exceeds the rate that is ‘just and reasonable.’ ”
Along with the conflict between two high-profile companies, the lawsuit and the Federal Communications Commission complaint give a glimpse of the massive infrastructure used to deliver electricity and telecommunications services in Florida.
The companies share an estimated 638,914 poles, with FPL owning 425,704 and AT&T owning 213,210, according to information in the Federal Communications Commission complaint. The shared poles are in a huge swath of the state where the companies overlap, including Columbia, Baker, Nassau, Duval, Bradford, Clay, St. Johns, Alachua, Putnam, Flagler, Volusia, Seminole, Brevard, Indian River, St. Lucie, Martin, Palm Beach, Broward and Miami-Dade counties, the FPL lawsuit said.
The lawsuit, in part, asks a federal judge to direct AT&T to remove its equipment from FPL poles --- with the electric utility noting that it can’t remove the equipment, in part because of concerns about interruption of service to AT&T customers.
“AT&T Florida has attached its specialized equipment and facilities to FPL's poles. Removal of the attachments requires the expertise, knowledge and equipment of AT&T Florida's personnel because the AT&T Florida equipment and facilities are different from the equipment and facilities utilized by FPL,” FPL lawyers wrote.